Template:Did you know nominations/List of microbiota species of the lower reproductive tract of women


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:50, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

List of microbiota species of the lower reproductive tract of women

 * ... that there are 39 different types of microbes that inhabit the lower reproductive tract of women?


 * ALT1:... that at least 39 different organisms inhabit the the lower reproductive tract of women?

Created/expanded by Bfpage (talk). Self-nominated at 18:51, 30 April 2015 (UTC).


 * This is list article, so I am uncertain whether or not it adheres to the requirements of being a possible DYK. Since it is a list article, the prose sections are sparse, but the list of 39 species of microorganisms is very apparent.   Bfpage &#124;leave a message 19:18, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * It is ok in terms of length of prose as it contains >1500 characters excluding the tables. I would advise you to change the first sentence, we no longer start lists with "This is a list of....". Maybe something like the "The lower reproductive tract of sexually mature women who are not immunocomprised is a microbiota where a number of normally non-pathogenic microbes are found." I don't know much about the subject so feel free to correct me if I phrased something wrong.  Cowlibob (talk) 06:17, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol voting keep.svg This list is new enough and long enough. Going with ALT1 as its safer not to state a precise number. The article is neutral and I don't believe there is any close paraphrasing. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:02, 22 May 2015 (UTC)