Template:Did you know nominations/LizardTech, Inc. v. Earth Resource Mapping, Inc.

LizardTech, Inc. v. Earth Resource Mapping, Inc.

 * ... that the LizardTech, Inc. v. Earth Resource Mapping, Inc. court ruling decisively applied the "written description doctrine" for patent infringement cases?

Created/expanded by Falsifian (talk). Nominated by Gyp2 (talk) at 22:04, 20 October 2011 (UTC)




 * Symbol question.svg Several unreferenced paras, though that can be fixed easily I'm sure; "decisively" should be reflected in the article itself; it seems justified by the abstract of the paper cited, which is all I can see.  That to pass for DYK, but otherwise, obviously the subject is highly technical, both legally and scientifically, but I have to say I found it almost entirely incomprehensible; the judgement is much better, and longer, & should maybe be used for quotes. The article probably tries to cover too much ground quickly, & what the  "written description doctrine" is is never explained. Johnbod (talk) 00:09, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Symbol delete vote.svg No attempt to address the problems raised above in 18 days. Unreferenced paragraphs are not accepted by DYK, so unfortunately, this article must be rejected.  Schwede 66  04:50, 14 November 2011 (UTC)