Template:Did you know nominations/Long Reef (New South Wales)


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 21:22, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Long Reef (New South Wales)

 * ... that 25 shipwrecks and scuttlings have been recorded at Long Reef? Source
 * ALT1:... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
 * Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Purico complex

Created by Filikovalo (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 08:10, 7 March 2018 (UTC).


 * Symbol confirmed.svg This article is new enough and long enough. The image is suitably licensed, the hook facts are cited inline and the article is neutral. I found one sentence copied from the source and I have rewritten it. I have also changed the number of shipwrecks and scuttlings in article and hook from 26 to 25, because one of the wrecks in the database was at a different location (in Queensland). Otherwise, no problems. QPQ has been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:07, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg Hi, I came by to promote this, but found many paragraphs without at least one citation, per Rule D2. I also think the image is not interesting; perhaps you could offer an image of one of those shipwrecks or scuttlings? Yoninah (talk) 21:38, 4 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Symbol confirmed.svg The citation needed tags have since been addressed. I think this picture of a beached ship, already used in the article, works well with Yoninah's suggestion (though it isn't technically a shipwreck or scuttling as referred to in the hook). --Paul_012 (talk) 09:48, 24 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Symbol possible vote.svg I have pulled this hook per the relevant discussion at WT:DYK. Gatoclass (talk) 21:45, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

thanks everyone. I was aware of the copy and paste issue. Just didn't get around to re-writing it. Filikovalo (talk) 06:08, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
 * ok...looking for a hook....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:52, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

I still think there was nothing wrong with the original hook, but as I can't be bothered debating it, here is one possible alt: - In order to use this as a hook, the source from Fossilworks would have to be added to the article, along with the statement in the article itself. Gatoclass (talk) 11:11, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
 * ALT2: ... that Bulgosuchus gargantua, a giant early temnospondyl from the Triassic period, is known only from Long Reef, New South Wales (pictured)?
 * reference added as requested Filikovalo (talk) 23:47, 30 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Symbol confirmed.svg This should be good now. Hook fact verified in the Fossilworks page and cited inline. Copy-paste issue appears to have been resolved. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 12:56, 6 June 2018 (UTC)