Template:Did you know nominations/Loved (video game)


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:00, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Loved (video game)

 * ... that no libraries were used during the development of Loved?
 * ALT1:... that one reviewer dubbed Loved "great high-brow lunchtime gaming"?
 * Reviewed: DashCon
 * Comment: I understand that gameplay sections should be sourced to secondary sources, but seeing as how most plot summaries can be traced back to primary sources, I hope this is sufficient for the time being.

Moved to mainspace by 23W (talk), Woodroar (talk). Nominated by 23W (talk) at 19:16, 28 July 2014 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg Gameplay would be much better if it were sourced. Even to an instruction manual. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:22, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg Started review on article talk page before DYK nom. New (28th), long enough, neutral, no copyvio found via spot check (though there are a few minor things that can be rephrased, QPQ done. The first hook needs a ref immediately following its fact in the WP article (see 3b). I'd actually strike that hook, though (as libraries are jargon-y) and mention Wired in the second hook and run that one. Every paragraph needs at least one citation (including gameplay). Please ping me if I don't respond. czar ♔   16:41, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I actually kinda like the first hook, though I wouldn't link "libraries" (as it just ruins the surprise). I still think Gameplay should have something backing it up (i.e. at least an explicit citation to the game and/or manual; the DYK exception is for plots, not gameplay, and most high quality VG articles have gameplay cited). Nom hasn't replied yet. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:48, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * , : Sorry, I'll try to get the gameplay paragraph cited as soon as possible. 23W 19:04, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Okay, it's been cited. I also removed the wikilink from the main hook. 23W 19:46, 2 August 2014 (UTC) Also added a ref after the sentence that the hook is referring to. 19:47, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Both hooks check out, everything cited. I think the ALT isn't as misleading and thus prefer it. czar ♔   22:38, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Cool. Thanks for your constructive feedback on both this page and the talk page! 23W 23:02, 2 August 2014 (UTC)