Template:Did you know nominations/Lucille Dumont


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:08, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Lucille Dumont

 * ... that Canadian singer and radio/television host Lucille Dumont (pictured) first performed under the name Micheline Lalonde to hide her real identity?


 * Reviewed: Martha Sonntag Bradley-Evans

Created by Howkafkaesque (talk). Self-nominated at 20:21, 3 June 2016 (UTC).


 * Symbol voting keep.svg New enough, long enough. Hook is interesting and cited to sources in French. No close paraphrasing on spot checks. QPQ present. Good to go! Raymie (t • c) 03:53, 7 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Symbol possible vote.svg Although the hook is stated in the article, I ran the two sources given through Google translate, and neither source mentions the name Micheline Lalonde. — Maile (talk) 22:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Maile, I apologize - I accidentally inserted the wrong sources for the inline citations. I've corrected the mistake & have cited the correct sources (5 in total). Thank you for pointing this out. Howkafkaesque (talk) 04:11, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol possible vote.svg The fact seems to be stated in source 2 bio.starquebec.net, on which this article is most heavily reliant. However, the authorship of this source is not clear to me; I'm not sure it is reliable, and this is a BLP. In the section entitled Crédits et liens (Sources and links), there is a link back to Wikipedia. I speak French; ping me and would be happy to review any French-language sources. Intelligent  sium  23:07, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Intelligentsium, thanks for raising your concerns. I initially shared your concerns about the reliability of the source; however, after having reviewed the Crédits et liens section, I believe the source is reliable because the information on the page appears to be drawn from the books and audio-visual documents cited ("Credits") & the Internet links ("liens") are simply included as external links for the audience's exploration. Also, I've changed the inline citations for the hook fact to include 4 sources in addition to the bio.starquebec.net resource. Howkafkaesque (talk) 04:11, 9 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg New reviewer needed to check the sourcing and hook issues before putting this back in prep. — Maile  (talk) 11:48, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The site should probably be regarded as a tertiary source. However, besides their sources, tertiary sources must also independently meet the requirement of a "reputation for fact-checking and accuracy", which generally comes from an author who is a professional in the field or a reliable publisher such as a news organ. Do you know anything about the authorship of the site that would confirm such a reputation? Intelligent  sium  02:39, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, Intelligentsium, I haven't been able to determine the authorship of the site. As a workaround, I'm currently going through the reliable sources used by the site (e.g. the documentary associated with CBC, Canada's national TV broadcaster) & will use those as sources to replace the site. I'll update here once finished. Howkafkaesque (talk) 21:59, 12 June 2016 (UTC)


 * I've eliminated bio.starquebec.net as a source for the article & would like to submit this for review. Howkafkaesque (talk) 21:24, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Hook, length, and date verified. No close paraphrasing detected. Thanks for the hard work! Intelligent  sium  22:12, 22 June 2016 (UTC)