Template:Did you know nominations/M. Manikandan


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by  MPJ  -DK 18:50, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

M. Manikandan

 * ... that the Tamil film director M. Manikandan started as a wedding photographer?


 * Reviewed: To follow Heroes of Remix

Created by Vensatry (talk). Self-nominated at 12:38, 4 September 2016 (UTC).

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 15:23, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg No issues found with article, ready for human review.
 * &#x2713; This article is new and was created on 11:27, 04 September 2016 (UTC)
 * &#x2713; This article meets the DYK criteria at 1844 characters
 * &#x2713; All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
 * &#x2713; This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
 * &#x2713; A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (10.7% confidence; confirm)
 * Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
 * No overall issues detected
 * &#x2713; The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 84 characters
 * &#x2713; Vensatry has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review of Template:Did you know nominations/Heroes of Remix was performed for this nomination.


 * Symbol confirmed.svg The article was created within the last 7 days and is over the 1,500 character limit. The article is well written and neutral. The hook is interesting and is supported by a reliable source. The user has submitted a review to meet the QPQ requirement. Kosack (talk) 16:32, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Kosack, you don't mention having checked for copyvio/close paraphrasing, a very important check and one for which the bot is not sufficiently reliable. Please also review that aspect of the DYK criteria. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:07, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Apologies, I did do a copyvio check, not sure why I forgot to include it. I've done another just to be sure and there's no issues with any violations. Thanks. Kosack (talk) 05:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the swift reply, Kosack. I've just removed my "?" icon above based on your reassurance (and recheck!). BlueMoonset (talk) 14:43, 15 September 2016 (UTC)