Template:Did you know nominations/Macleay's dorcopsis


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:56, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Macleay's dorcopsis

 * ... that although the IUCN at one time considered Macleay's dorcopsis to be a vulnerable species, it is now rated as "least concern"?


 * Reviewed: Bungy Watson

5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 09:47, 23 June 2016 (UTC).



Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This bot is experimental; please report any issues. This is not a substitute for a human review. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 23:37, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol support vote.svg No issues found.
 * &#x2713; This article has been expanded from 291 chars to 1824 chars since 03:39, 21 December 2015 (UTC), a 6.27-fold expansion
 * &#x2713; This article meets the DYK criteria at 1824 characters
 * &#x2713; All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
 * &#x2713; This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
 * &#x2713; The probability of copyright violation is 1.0%. (confirm)
 * Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
 * &#x2713; The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 134 characters
 * &#x2713; This is Cwmhiraeth's 1287th nomination. A QPQ review of Template:Did you know nominations/Bungy Watson was performed for this nomination.


 * Symbol confirmed.svg Adding onto the bots review: Hook is interesting, cited and source supports it. The article is neutral, long enough, new enough and well sourced. No copyvios and QPQ is done correctly. Well done. - Yellow Dingo (talk) 13:02, 27 June 2016 (UTC)