Template:Did you know nominations/Madhuri Dixit filmography


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:24, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Madhuri Dixit filmography

 * ... that Madhuri Dixit (pictured) holds the record for the most nominations (fourteen) of the Filmfare Award for Best Actress?


 * Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/My Girl (EP)

Created by FrB.TG (talk). Self-nominated at 22:42, 23 May 2015 (UTC).


 * Long enough, and new enough. DES (talk) 17:31, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The hook fails verification. One cited source does not mention Madhuri Dixit in its prose at all (so i removed it from the article). The other lists her award noms and wins, and says she is a 'record holder" but does not specifically support that 14 noms Best Actress is a record or is "the most for any actress." (which could mean a tie for 14). DES (talk) 17:31, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

DES (talk) 17:31, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * It says "Best Actress Nomination—A record holder" and after a sentence "has been nominated as many as 14 times in the Filmfare Best Actress category", which I think is enough to be verified. -- FrankBoy CHITCHAT  18:18, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Okay, how about this: ALT1: ... that Madhuri Dixit (pictured) is a 14-time nominee of the Filmfare Award for Best Actress? --  FrankBoy  CHITCHAT  19:44, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * That works. If I have misinterpreted the source i'm sorry, and if another user wants to say that the original hook can be used, I won't object. Let me go through the rest of the checks. DES (talk) 20:17, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Image license OK. Image works reasonably well at small size.
 * No apparent policy issues on the page, and nothing that looks like a probable copyvio.
 * Hook not too long.
 * Hook reasonably interesting
 * Hook supported by an inline cite, with a RS that verifies the exact text of the hook.
 * Hook is not POV.
 * QPQ done (so i didn't check if it was required).

looks good to me. DES (talk) 20:28, 24 May 2015 (UTC)