Template:Did you know nominations/Magema Magwaza Fuze


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:45, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Magema Magwaza Fuze

 * ... that Magema Magwaza Fuze (pictured) was the first native Zulu speaker to publish a book in the Zulu language?
 * ALT1:... that ...?
 * Reviewed: Lepidonotus squamatus

Created by Philafrenzy (talk) and Whispyhistory (talk). Nominated by Philafrenzy (talk) at 07:38, 4 August 2018 (UTC).


 * Will check. Philafrenzy (talk) 18:25, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Made a few changes but I am finding minimal matches that are mostly names. Should be OK now. Philafrenzy (talk) 19:58, 9 August 2018 (UTC) can you tick it if you are happy? Thanks. Philafrenzy (talk) 21:02, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
 * It was User:Whispyhistory that did the review, and he isn't the nominator of this DYK. Also, it didn't seem complete. So I can't tick off QPQ. Catrìona (talk) 21:11, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
 * It's ok to use my QPQ. Thanks for reviewing. Whispyhistory (talk) 21:13, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
 * , I think you need to say, on the other page probably, in what respect you feel it is incomplete so that it can be fixed. It's certainly OK for any co-creator to do the review, and in fact any editor at all. Philafrenzy (talk) 21:19, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If the QPQ is deemed to be complete, I'll accept it. Catrìona (talk) 15:57, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Catrìona, please be sure, when you finish this review, to put one of the legal values in the "status" field of the DYK checklist template. Note that icons are not valid in this field; as the documentation says, you must use "y" if no problems, "?" for minor problems, "maybe" if nomination needs work, "no" if completely ineligible, "again" to request another reviewer take a look for status values. Many thanks. (Note: the submitted QPQ review seems mostly complete, but should at least touch on neutrality in hook and article.) BlueMoonset (talk) 04:30, 14 August 2018 (UTC)