Template:Did you know nominations/Major thirds tuning

Major thirds tuning

 * ... that the Russian guitar's D-G-B-D-G-B-D tuning (illustrated) approximates the major-thirds tuning D#-G-B-D#-G-B-D#?
 * Reviewed: University of Freiburg Biological Sciences Faculty
 * Comment: Five-fold expansion began on the 10th.

Created/expanded by Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk). Self nom at 18:56, 22 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Symbol possible vote.svg I've not reviewed the article, but the five-fold expansion started on 10 June and finished on 22 June, and it was nominated on 22 June. I don't believe this pass the DYK rules. Mentoz86 (talk) 21:06, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * This article was nominated on the 13th, along with augmented-fourths tuning. The correct statistics on five-fold expansion were recorded in this diff's two edit-summaries: Again, a five-fold expansion had been completed on the 20th, two days before you left your comment. Neither had been reviewed so I split the two into separate nominations, making a reviewer's task easier. (This history was declared in edit summaries here.) Sorry for the appearance of "irregularities" in the DYK nomination for a "regular tuning"! :) Kiefer  .Wolfowitz  22:21, 24 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Symbol question.svg Well, then it's another story: Article is expanded fivefolds, nominated in time, long enough, neutral and have inline citations, and hook is backed up by a source. Only thing missing is a citation in the "Other major-thirds tunings" section. Mentoz86 (talk) 21:16, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking a second look. I understand that the separation of the two nominations caused confusion. Thanks again! Kiefer  .Wolfowitz  21:45, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I removed one sentence of OR. I put footnotes for the other stuff. Professor Griewank's paper has the tunings on pages 3-4. Kiefer  .Wolfowitz  21:47, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Great, this one is good to go! Mentoz86 (talk) 20:29, 27 June 2012 (UTC)