Template:Did you know nominations/Mandeville-Anthony v. The Walt Disney Company

Notability concerns

Mandeville-Anthony v. The Walt Disney Company

 * ... that in Mandeville-Anthony v. The Walt Disney Company a U.S. court held general concepts of a movie, like anthropomorphized cars, are not copyrightable?

Moved to mainspace by Info2014bears (talk). Nominated by Colinpmacarthur (talk) at 22:21, 1 November 2013 (UTC).


 * Symbol possible vote.svg I cannot see any secondary reliable sources attesting to the subject's notability. All sources used in the article are WP:PRIMARY legal documents. I think the article fails the general notability requirements. There are also other points of concern such as grammatical errors and references which do not verify the facts they are attached to, such as the reference of the "Legal Information Institute at Cornell Law School" which does not refer to the case of the article. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις  05:57, 3 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Symbol delete vote.svg Although the nominator's talk page was pinged on November 3, there have been no attempts to address any of the issues raised in the review. Accordingly, the nomination is being closed as unsuccessful. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2013 (UTC)