Template:Did you know nominations/Marcus Cooper (property developer)


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 11:11, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Marcus Cooper (property developer)

 * ... that in 2013, Marcus Cooper bought seven houses in central London (pictured) to create a £200 million "supermansion", and sold it to fellow property developer Christian Candy in 2014?


 * Reviewed: Michael Derrick Hudson
 * Comment: other hooks welcome

Created by Edwardx (talk). Self-nominated at 21:53, 23 August 2015 (UTC).


 * Symbol possible vote.svg Nomination still lacks a QPQ after over three weeks. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:36, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the reminder. QPQ review done. Edwardx (talk) 22:51, 14 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Full review needed now that QPQ has been submitted. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:51, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol possible vote.svgle has a justified citation needed tag. sstflyer 14:45, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Citation added. Edwardx (talk) 12:28, 20 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Full review still needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:00, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg New enough when nominated. Long enough at 1,739 characters. Article is reasonably neutral and cites sources with inline citations. Copyvios turned up one website which mirrored Wikipedia content (97.8% confidence), but other than that there are no problems. Hook is cited to a verifiable online source and is short enough. No image. QPQ done. sstflyer 04:56, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Hook isn't quite supported by the text in the article, which says he was planning to combine them. Adam Cuerden (talk) 18:06, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Fair point. What if we were to change "it" to "them" in the hook - would that suffice? Edwardx (talk) 18:14, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Depends on the second source, I'd say. If it gives support to it having been combined already, then the article needs to change; if it doesn't, the hook needs to change. Adam Cuerden (talk) 18:25, 28 September 2015 (UTC)