Template:Did you know nominations/Margaret Thorp


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:13, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Margaret Thorp, Conscription disturbance at the Brisbane School of Arts

 * ... that peace activist Margaret Thorp was physically attacked when she attempted to disrupt a pro-conscription rally? Source: This online article discusses the event briefly.  The book Gender and War: Australians at War in the Twentieth Century describes it in more detail but only seems to be eratically available online on Google Books.  It is also discussed at length in "Peace Angel of World War I" which unfortunately is not online.
 * ALT1:... that peace activist Margaret Thorp was punched, scratched, and kicked by women at a pro-conscription rally?
 * Reviewed: Eric Taylor (artist), 1257 Samalas eruption
 * Comment: This account is a declared alt-account of User:Lankiveil. For full disclosure I have written both articles while employed as a WIR at the State Library of Queensland.  Both articles were created in my user space and moved into mainspace today.

Created by Craig Franklin (SLQ) (talk). Self-nominated at 06:06, 12 October 2016 (UTC).


 * A second QPQ review is required for a two-article hook. P p p er y 00:13, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Ah, I didn't know that. I'll get to it as soon as I can.  Any feedback on the nomination itself, QPQ aside?  Lankiveil (speak to me) 07:55, 16 October 2016 (UTC).
 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Second QPQ completed, now ready for re-review.  Craig Franklin (SLQ) (talk) 23:50, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol voting keep.svg Starting review: The QPQs claimed were very light on, checking for a QPQ or a hook, rather than doing a full assessment. We do need this sort of review, but I would much rather see a complete QPQ followed all the way from initial evaluation, to confirming improvements and checking any new hooks. Margaret Thorp is new, large, referenced, and neutral enough and no copyright probs. Conscription disturbance at the Brisbane School of Arts is new and large enough. Copyright issues not detected. Referenced sufficiently. Both hooks are in the article and referenced, and very likely confirmed by the reference (as I could only partly read it on gbooks). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:05, 1 November 2016 (UTC)