Template:Did you know nominations/Maritz, Inc. v. Cybergold, Inc.


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 12:21, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Maritz, Inc. v. Cybergold, Inc.

 * ... that operator of website, for which server was located in California, was subject to personal jurisdiction in Missouri under "commission of a tortious act" provision of Missouri's long-arm statute?


 * Comment: This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of California, Berkeley supported by WikiProject Cyberlaw and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2015 Q1 term.
 * Comment: This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of California, Berkeley supported by WikiProject Cyberlaw and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2015 Q1 term.

5x expanded by Natcha.s (talk). Self-nominated at 10:52, 6 April 2015 (UTC).


 * Symbol delete vote.svg Not a fivefold. Previous revision was 2,939 characters/bytes. Current revision is 4,329 characters/bytes. For fivefold expansion, the article must be 14.7 kilobytes in prose. But if you don't want to expand the article a lot more with more paragraphs, why not make this article a Good Article quality? George Ho (talk) 03:32, 7 April 2015 (UTC)