Template:Did you know nominations/Massachusetts Convention of Towns


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:19, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Massachusetts Convention of Towns

 * ... that the Massachusetts Convention of Towns in 1768 created a war scare, causing prices to drop on the London Stock Exchange? Source: Miller, John C. (September 1934). "The Massachusetts Convention, 1768". The New England Quarterly. 7 (3): 445–474. JSTOR 359673  "A small war scare ran through London when rumors began to spread of the work of the Boston town-meeting and the convention. When news of the activities of the radicals reached London, many expected that the troops would be met with resistance if they attempted to land. The Boston news was so alarming that stocks tumbled on the London exchange."
 * ALT1:... that after the Massachusetts Convention of Towns in 1768, British troops sailing into Boston Harbor expected to meet with violent opposition? Source: Miller, John C. (September 1934). "The Massachusetts Convention, 1768". The New England Quarterly. 7 (3): 445–474. JSTOR 359673  "The troops were landed under the guns and 'in Battle Array, expecting from the representations that had been made to them, to meet with a violent opposition.'"
 * Reviewed: Stop Child Abuse
 * Comment: I created another nomination page in error - can someone please delete it? Thanks!

Created by MopTop (talk). Self-nominated at 19:14, 5 September 2017 (UTC).


 * Symbol confirmed.svg New, sufficiently long, cited to a letter of the era. Mangoe (talk) 02:01, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg  you should provide a review that explicitly confirms that the five main DYK criteria have been met. So far you have verified newness, length, and inline hook cite. Please also check for neutrality, close paraphrasing, and whether the QPQ has been done properly. The chart in this article also needs a citation to show where the information came from. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 22:19, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
 * There is a citation, right after "The following towns sent delegates to the convention." --MopTop (talk) 12:13, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Article is neutral and has no apparent copvios. QPQ accepted. The placement of the citation makes sense ("following towns" implies that the citation is for the information that follows), and does not impact the hook regardless. Relying on 's review for newness, length, and hook. --Usernameunique (talk) 21:26, 9 September 2017 (UTC)