Template:Did you know nominations/Microsoft v. AT&T

Microsoft v. AT&T
Created/expanded by Wulingqi (talk). Nominated by Dc.to.daylight (talk) at 03:13, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * ... that in Microsoft v. AT&T, copying and installing software abroad onto foreign-manufactured computers were not considered as patent infringement under U.S. Patent Law?


 * Symbol delete vote.svg 5x expansion has not been done in enough time. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 12:23, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg Thine Antique Pen is correct on the technicality. Both editor and nominator are newbies to Wikipedia. The article is about a case decided by the United States Supreme Court. As an FYI, in case anyone can find cause to give this a second look:
 * Wulingqi is a new editor as of September 2012
 * Article created  by Jmcneill2 on May 1, 2007 as a one-sentence stub
 * July 31, 2012, article had 831 characters of readable prose
 * 13.65X expansion by Wulingqi on October 17, 2012, first day of expanding, brought the article to 11,349 characters of readable prose
 * Wulingqi has continued to improve the article since that date
 * Article currently has 12,019 characters of readable prose
 * — Maile (talk) 15:11, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually, Symbol confirmed.svg good to go per WP:DYKSG. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 15:17, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh, good for you, Thine Antique Pen. You're quick! — Maile (talk) 15:19, 13 November 2012 (UTC)