Template:Did you know nominations/Mining industry of Tunisia


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Keilana (talk) 02:44, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Mining industry of Tunisia

 * ... that only the government of Tunisia is allowed to own mines in that country?


 * Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Amir al-Hajj

Moved to mainspace by Rosiestep (talk), Nvvchar (talk, Dr. Blofeld (talk), and Kelapstick (talk). Nominated by Rosiestep (talk) at 17:29, 2 July 2015 (UTC).


 * Symbol confirmed.svg Good.  Volcano guy  10:00, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Full review needed. Volcanoguy, the review must be based on the DYK criteria, and list what you checked and what was found. Please see the DYK reviewing guide for more details, and WP:DYK and WP:DYKSG for the detailed criteria; a summation can be found above the edit window when you edit these review templates. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:42, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg New enough, long enough, neutrally written, well referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. The hook is very good, but it lacks an inline cite in the article. QPQ done. Yoninah (talk) 20:17, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks Yoninah for the review. I have fixed the reference of USGS in the legal section. The hook needs revision and I propose this ALT1 hook: ... that the government of Tunisia owns and regulates all mining operations but private operation is promoted by the National Office of Mines?  Nvvchar . 01:13, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for adding the cite. But why change the hook? The original hook is very hooky; the alt is too explanatory and therefore rather dry. Yoninah (talk) 09:08, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Yoninah It is fine then. Please consider the original hook for approval. Nvvchar . 09:27, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Great. Hook ref verified and cited inline. Original hook good to go. Yoninah (talk) 10:18, 2 September 2015 (UTC)