Template:Did you know nominations/Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.

Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.

 * ... that, in Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court ordered a car dealer in Puerto Rico to arbitrate its Sherman Act case in Tokyo per a contract under Swiss law?
 * ALT1:... that, in Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court held that Sherman Act antitrust claims could be arbitrated?
 * Reviewed: Short No.1 biplane
 * Comment: Sorry for not getting this in quite within five days of creation. The Easter holiday got in the way, and I wanted to make sure I reached the majority opinion so the hook could be verified, rather than wait till I finished what is as usual going to be another magnum opus on a Supreme Court case in what is admittedly an unexciting area of law.

Created/expanded by Daniel Case (talk). Self nom at 18:51, 11 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Symbol confirmed.svg A magnum opus indeed. Good to go. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:09, 22 April 2012 (UTC)