Template:Did you know nominations/Mood Repair Strategies

Referencing

Mood Repair Strategies

 * ... that mood repair strategies offer techniques that an individual can use to shift their mood from general sadness or clinical depression to a state of greater contentment or happiness?
 * Reviewed: This is my first DYK nomination
 * Comment: Article moved to mainspace on March 25. Hook cited in Paragraph 3

Created by JeremyKozak (talk), RoderickPsy (talk). Nominated by JeremyKozak (talk) at 17:04, 25 March 2012 (UTC)




 * Symbol possible vote.svg Article is not fully supported by inline sources. Article has an orphan tag at the top.  Proposed hook reads a bit like an advertisement to me and it doesn't appear fully supported by the article.   I can see it says three ways to do it but I can't see it in the article.
 * Symbol question.svg "Mood Repair strategies have existed unnamed for basically all of modern human history." "This has shown to be effective even among those suffering with depression." Statements like this feel like they are not neutral, or need more explanation.  It could really use some explanation answering who did this, etc.  especially on a medical related topic.
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Article is new enough and long enough. Hook is properly formatted. --LauraHale (talk) 06:55, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Alt hook needs to be proposed, inline citations need to present for all facts (one at end of paragraph covering facts in paragraph is good.), article needs de-orphaning and more detail to explain things to make article less ambigious and more neutral. --LauraHale (talk) 06:55, 26 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: Article name was changed. (Not sure how to fix this page.)  Hook was changed.  There still remains an unsourced paragraph and sections that feel like they need greater clarity. Example: "Extensive listing and studying of these techniques started in the mid 1990's." Extensive listing and studying began by whom?  The article is also tagged as a stub. --LauraHale (talk) 19:33, 26 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Looks somewhat improved. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:55, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg Since the beginning of April most of the sources have been classified as unreliable medical sources or "" -- Esemono (talk) 03:40, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Symbol delete vote.svg I think this tag works better Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:19, 23 April 2012 (UTC)