Template:Did you know nominations/Mosaic (Star Trek)


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:31, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Mosaic (Star Trek)

 * ... the novel Mosaic by Jeri Taylor was one of two novels to be considered canon in the Star Trek universe?
 * Reviewed: Mushroom ketchup

Created by Miyagawa (talk). Self nominated at 13:52, 12 September 2014 (UTC).


 * Why were considered? Was? Is this no longer considered canon? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:37, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
 * There's no current guidance as to what and what isn't considered canon. Older versions of the official website had a canon guide (which is used as a reference) but the current version has the guide completely removed so there's no way of saying whether it is or isn't at present. Miyagawa (talk) 15:32, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
 * "Was" is a bit strong for that situation. "As of (year), it is one of two novels to have been considered canon" may work better. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:32, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Made the change within the article. Miyagawa (talk) 22:25, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
 * So now for the hook: does ALT1: "... the novel Mosaic by Jeri Taylor is one of two novels to have been considered canon in the Star Trek universe?" work for you? Doesn't imply as strongly that the book is no longer considered canon. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:22, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Sounds good - I've struck off the original and popped an Alt1 marker above so that it can be spotted. Miyagawa (talk) 10:25, 13 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Symbol voting keep.svg Article is new enough and long enough. Interesting hook fact is cited in article. AGF on offline refs, online refs have no issues. No image in hook. Good to go. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:33, 13 September 2014 (UTC)