Template:Did you know nominations/Murata Jukō


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:15, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Murata Jukō

 * ... that Murata Jukō created the Japanese tea ceremony?
 * Reviewed: Herdla Airport ‎

5x expanded by Yunshui (talk), Tksb (talk). Nominated by Yunshui (talk) at 12:03, 29 October 2014 (UTC).


 * Symbol confirmed.svg Looks good; the whole article is referenced, esp. that statement. However, we can also say that:
 * ALT1: ... that Murata Jukō created chanoyu, the Japanese tea ceremony?
 * This alt would be less confusing, as the article references chanoyu, but Japanese tea ceremony is linked, i.e. chanoyu. – Epicgenius (talk) 20:05, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
 * As an alternative, the article itself can be changed to link directly to Japanese tea ceremony, and we can keep the existing hook: i.e. as the founder of chanoyu, the Japanese tea ceremony.
 * Do you have any comments? – Epicgenius (talk) 15:02, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I see your point. I'm in favour of changing the article, myself, so I'll go and do that now. Yunshui 雲 水 15:09, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg The original hook looks good to go. Epicgenius (talk) 18:25, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg   Per Rule H2, you cannot approve your own hook. This review is also incomplete. Details that are supposed to be checked in a review can be found at  DYK Reviewing guide. Yoninah (talk) 19:16, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
 * , I am not approving my own hook, so there may be confusion about that. I have edited my comment, to indicate the original hook is the one that I approve. I would like to complete the review: Epicgenius (talk) 19:20, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
 * To finish off the review:
 * The 5x expansion has been verified. Its prose is long enough.
 * I cannot see any foreign-language sources that are denoted as such.
 * I used a plagiarism checker, and the text does not appear to have been copied without attribution (i.e. it is original text).
 * The article has a neutral POV.
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Now the original hook is good to go. I am not very familiar with doing DYK reviews, so I apologize for any snags. – Epicgenius (talk) 19:26, 30 October 2014 (UTC)