Template:Did you know nominations/Nazario Collection


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:28, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Nazario Collection

 * ... that according to tradition the Nazario Collection was passed down from taíno high chief Agüeybaná II?


 * ALT 1: ... that a University of Puerto Rico study established that the petroglyphs in the Nazario Collection were not made using any previously known local technique?


 * Reviewed: El Laco

Created by Old School WWC Fan (talk). Self-nominated at 23:19, 11 June 2016 (UTC)




 * Review by Maile
 * QPQ
 * June 11-14, 2016 QPQ review by Old School WWC Fan has not been used by him as a QPQ on any previous nomination
 * Eligibility
 * Article created by Old School WWC Fan on June 4, 2016 and has 12782 characters (0 words) "readable prose size"
 * Article is NPOV, currently stable, no edit wars, no dispute tags
 * Sourcing
 * Every paragraph sourced inline, both offline and online, mostly Spanish language sources
 * Note: AGF on Spanish language sourcing
 * Citations are appropriately formatted
 * No bare URLs
 * Hook
 * Hook is 102 characters, NPOV, stated in the article and sourced
 * ALT1 is 155 characters, NPOV, stated in the article and sourced
 * Image
 * No image used
 * Tools
 * Earwig's Copyvio Detector shows no concerns from external sourcing, nor any indication of text copied from other Wikipedia articles
 * Dab solver (Disambig links tool) says there are no disambiguation links in the article

This certainly passes. I find this to be an intriguing subject matter, and am a bit disappointed that Commons photographers/uploaders haven't discovered these. Or, at least, no images are uploaded at Commons under any name I could think of. — Maile (talk) 20:12, 23 June 2016 (UTC)