Template:Did you know nominations/New Detroit Arena


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:45, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

New Detroit Arena

 * ... that the Detroit Red Wings' new arena will be surrounded by a unique, glass-roofed "street" as its concourse?
 * ALT1:... that the Detroit Red Wings' new arena will anchor a $650 million redevelopment project in Downtown Detroit?
 * Reviewed: Italian pool frog ‎

Created by ViperSnake151 (talk). Self nominated at 05:08, 22 September 2014 (UTC).


 * : REVIEW COMPLETED - The following has been checked in this review by Esemono 
 * Green check.svg QPQ by ViperSnake151 September 21, 2014
 * Green check.svg Article created by ViperSnake151 on September 21, 2014 and has 4867 characters of readable prose
 * Green check.svg NPOV
 * Green check.svg Hook is interesting, short enough at 143 characters and sourced with Ref 1
 * Green check.svg Every paragraph sourced
 * Symbol possible vote.svg Earwig @ Toolserver Copyvio Detector some copyvio
 * Symbol possible vote.svg -- Esemono (talk) 06:56, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Excuse me but that looks like a reverse copyvio, given that wording was adapted from the original Joe Lewis Arena article. ViperSnake151   Talk  16:08, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Hmmmm strange. -- Esemono (talk) 04:29, 23 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Need a second opinion about how to proceed with source copyvio -- Esemono (talk) 04:29, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Symbol possible vote.svg "Reverse copyvio" would imply that someone else copied Wikipedia, but that's not possible. The overlap of the article and this blog post is unquestionable, the blog post is from Feb 2014, and the blog is under copyright. Even if that blog paraphrased from some other source---not sure what means with "adapted from the original Joe Lewis Arena article"---it should be reworded or quoted here. --Pgallert (talk) 10:08, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * That page is dated February 13, 2014. This revision pre-dates it, and contains all the stuff he copied and pasted. Yes, it is a copyvio of Wikipedia. ViperSnake151   Talk  15:17, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Ah, okay, I didn't realise that 'New Detroit Arena' and 'Joe Louis Arena' are different articles. I checked the situation again, and it is clear that the allsportsblog page lifted Wikipedia content without attribution. As there is obviously quite some overlap between the two Wikipedia articles, and I have thus now checked whether there is sufficient new content in the article nominated here. This checks out as well. --Pgallert (talk) 05:25, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg There might still be some minor wording issue with the original hook, unless I again misunderstood something: Can a concourse really surround the stadium? I mean, walkways cannot meet everywhere, and while indeed this picture shows that the glass roof itself is all around, for the concourse we might need to find another expression. --Pgallert (talk) 05:25, 1 October 2014 (UTC)


 * ALT2 ... that the Detroit Red Wings' new arena will utilize a unique, glass-roofed "street" as its concourse?
 * ALT1 is properly referenced, but maybe the original hook can be improved. --Pgallert (talk) 05:25, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg for ALT1 and ALT2, both are suitably referenced. Original hook struck for clarity. --Pgallert (talk) 05:23, 2 October 2014 (UTC)