Template:Did you know nominations/New England tree frog


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:02, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

New England tree frog, Davies' tree frog

 * ... that the New England tree frog and the Davies' tree frog (pictured) are threatened by the introduction of exotic fish such as trout into the streams in which they breed?
 * Reviewed: Spondent Pariter
 * Comment: Also reviewed Flora of the Sierra Nevada alpine zone

5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self nominated at 11:05, 7 September 2014 (UTC).


 * Symbol confirmed.svg Article New England tree frog is NOT new enough - it has not been expanded 5x or promoted to good article status within the past 10 days. It is long enough. I did not find any issues with the Davies' tree frog article. Dup detector does not show any significant issues with close paraphrasing, copyright violations or plagiarism for either article compared with their sources. Articles and hook are neutral and well-cited. Image is free and is used in the Davies' tree frog article. One remedy would be to remove the New England tree frog from the nomination. --Big_iron (talk) 12:06, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I think you are mistaken and will find that the New England tree frog was 351 B prior to my expansion on 3rd September and is now 2900 B, an approximately eight-fold expansion. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:36, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * You are right. It seems as if the DYK check script had a problem here. I withdraw my objection. --Big_iron (talk) 14:57, 13 September 2014 (UTC)