Template:Did you know nominations/Ni no Kuni


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 13:32, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Ni no Kuni

 * ... that Ni no Kuni was conceived as a project for Level-5's tenth anniversary?


 * ALT1:... that the Ni no Kuni series consists of three role-playing games and one social card game?
 * ALT2:... that only one Ni no Kuni game was localized?
 * Reviewed: Kirby's Block Ball

Improved to Good Article status by Rhain1999 (talk). Self-nominated at 11:06, 10 October 2015 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg Promoted to GA in a timely manner, and certainly long enough. Well-written and cited, per GA demands. First hook is well sourced, the second does not have a source immediately after the information in the article. I looked on the nearest reference to it but couldn't find the information. On the third hook, I can't find affirmation that only one game was localized: reference 37 does not say which game was localized, it is named in #38, but that has no mention that it was the only one. The first hook should be good to go, if you are preferring the alternatives we may have to work on the referencing &#39;&#39;&#39;tAD&#39;&#39;&#39; (talk) 17:15, 12 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks, . The alternatives are not directly mentioned in any of the references; instead, they're implied through multiple references (one stating that Wrath of the White Witch was localised, and one stating that Dominion of the Dark Djinn was not, etc.). If this isn't allowed, then I'm very happy with using the main hook instead. – Rhain1999  (talk to me) 07:30, 13 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Symbol voting keep.svg First hook is sourced and no other issues with article. Above review also states same. I assume good faith to clear this old nomination, promoted to good article status and deserves place on main page. Good to go for original/main hook.-- Human 3015   TALK   07:27, 26 October 2015 (UTC)