Template:Did you know nominations/No. 482 Squadron RAAF

No. 482 Squadron RAAF

 * ... that No. 482 Squadron RAAF main hangar, upgraded in preparation for the entry into service of the F-111C swing-wing bomber, was nicknamed the "Taj Mahal"?
 * Reviewed: Intérpretes

5x expanded by Ian Rose (talk). Self nominated at 03:16, 12 December 2013 (UTC).


 * I propose to shorten the hook: Alt1 * ... that No. 482 Squadron RAAF main hangar, upgraded to accommodate the F-111C swing-wing bomber, was nicknamed the "Taj Mahal"? --  Ohc  ¡digame! 03:23, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
 * That's absolutely fine by me. Tks/cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 03:36, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi Ohconfucius, did you (or were you planning to) review the article against the DYK criteria or was it just tweaking the hook that you wanted to do? Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 05:18, 24 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Full review needed now that hook has been tweaked. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:52, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I'll do this one. — Maile (talk) 23:08, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

The following has been checked in this review by Maile
 * QPQ done by Ian Rose same date as this nomination
 * Eligibility
 * Article created by Newm30 on July 16, 2012 with pre-expansion size of 823 characters of readable prose
 * 5X expansion began by Ian Rose in Dec 11, 2013 and brought it to 5,712 characters of readable prose
 * Also promoted to Good Article status on December 21, 2013
 * Has not appeared on DYK previously
 * Article is NPOV, stable, no edit wars, no dispute tags, no outstanding talk page issues
 * Sourcing
 * Every paragraph sourced
 * No bare URLs, and no external links used as inline sources
 * Hook
 * Hook #1 is NPOV, 155 characters, stated in the article and sourced off line
 * Hook #2 (ALT1) is 136 characters and is a re-wording of the original hook; therefore, stated in the article and sourced offline
 * Tools
 * Earwig (Copyvio check) found no violations
 * Duplication Detector spot check found no copyvio found
 * Disambig links tool found no issues
 * External links tool showed only one source that required registration

Good 2 go. This is a well-done and well-sourced chronological article on the history of this RAAF squadron.— Maile (talk) 00:04, 10 January 2014 (UTC)