Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Gotham Shield


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:44, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Operation Gotham Shield

 * ... that even a "nuclear bomb" was unable to stop traffic in the Lincoln Tunnel?
 * ALT1 ... that, last year, a nuclear bomb was "detonated" at the entrance to the Lincoln Tunnel?
 * ALT2 ... that, last year, there was a simulated nuclear weapons attack against the New York City area?
 * Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Houdini Museum of New York

Created by Chetsford (talk). Self-nominated at 19:56, 7 January 2018 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg New enough, long enough, meets core content policies. I love the hook, but can't find it in the article.  Jakob ( talk ) 20:25, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Jakob Coles thanks for the review! I've proposed an Alt1. Chetsford (talk) 11:45, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * COMMENT: As written, both ALT0 and ALT1 confusing (no bomb, no denotation). Consider something more explicit: ...that in a war games simulation, a nuclear device was exploded at the New Jersey entrance to the Lincoln Tunnel? David notMD (talk) 01:24, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
 * No nuclear device was exploded at the Lincoln Tunnel as part of the simulation. Chetsford (talk) 18:20, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks - new alt proposed. Chetsford (talk) 03:29, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg As this appears to utilize the same references to the previous hook, the issue appears to be resolved. A new reviewer is needed, and it should pass easily.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 20:06, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg As this appears to utilize the same references to the previous hook, the issue appears to be resolved. A new reviewer is needed, and it should pass easily.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 20:06, 21 February 2018 (UTC)