Template:Did you know nominations/Pangeran Pekik


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:46, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Pangeran Pekik

 * ... that the Javanese prince Pangeran Pekik was killed under orders of his son-in-law Amangkurat I?
 * Reviewed: NDR Chor

Created by HaEr48 (talk). Self-nominated at 03:23, 14 April 2017 (UTC).


 * Symbol confirmed.svg Created on 9 April, long enough, neutral, very well referenced, no close paraphrasing from the sources I could access. Hook is interesting and supported by an inline citation. QPQ is in progress. 97198 (talk) 12:02, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg Hi, I came by to promote this. Everything's fine with the article, but the second link in the hook is to Amangkurat I of Mataram, a completely unsourced article. We generally do not link to substandard articles on the main page. Would you be able to add one or two sources to the latter article so we can link to it? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 19:49, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Didn't realize that the article for Amagkurat I is in such a bad state. I added two books which extensively discuss Amangkurat I's life and reign. If we need more specific citation (inline & with page numbers), give me one or two days to work on it. FWIW, much of what is written there is in line with what I understand about him. Except for the paragraph that starts with "One of Amangkurat I foreign policy", which I haven't heard about. But probably I'll find it in the sources. HaEr48 (talk) 01:16, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Are you happy with this now? If so, could you replace the tick. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:35, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Thank you, that second article looks a lot better. Restoring tick per 97198's review. Yoninah (talk) 18:25, 27 April 2017 (UTC)