Template:Did you know nominations/Peabody Terrace


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 14:56, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Peabody Terrace

 * ... that in 1963 the Harvard Crimson published a photo of the school's "hideous" new housing complex for married students (pictured) over the caption, "University Moves to Thwart Early Marriages"?
 * Reviewed: Ashelman Run

Created by EEng (talk). Self nominated at 01:17, 26 December 2014 (UTC).


 * Symbol confirmed.svg Article is new, started Dec. 26.
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Long enough.
 * Symbol confirmed.svg No problems with appropriate sourcing, neutrality, or paraphrasing/copyright.
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Image file license checks out OK.
 * Symbol question.svg Hook: I very much like the witty tone; it's very catchy. However, I wonder if it could be made shorter. Offhand, maybe something like: ALT1 ... that in 1963 the Harvard Crimson criticized the new housing complex for married students (pictured) as "University Moves to Thwart Early Marriages"? --Tryptofish (talk) 22:05, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
 * So, Typofish, we meet again! The only problem with the suggested change is, well, read it carefully. You could say, "X criticized Y as a 'University Move to Thwart Early Marriages' " but then that's not the actual quote. We could try
 * ALT2 ... that in 1963 the Harvard Crimson captioned a photo of the school's "hideous" new housing complex for married students (pictured), "University Moves to Thwart Early Marriages"?
 * but as I write I realize I considered it before, the problem being that by the end of the sentence it's easy to forget the the quote is the caption. But I leave the choice to others. ("hideous" is needed because otherwise the reader doesn't understand what the basis is for the potential, um, thwartation I just made that word thwartation up. ) EEng (talk) 22:19, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Let's thwart misspelling my user name as Typo. Understood, so how about:
 * ALT3 ... that "University Moves to Thwart Early Marriages" was the 1963 Harvard Crimson caption beneath a photo of the school's "hideous" new housing complex for married students (pictured)?
 * --Tryptofish (talk) 22:30, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Beautiful. Please re-tick. EEng (talk) 23:14, 26 December 2014 (UTC) [slight change to hook]
 * Symbol question.svg I can't re-tick this. One statement relies on some Wiki-alike web source that has no references or sort. Also, that source is called "WikiArquitectura". It is edited by email-confirmed users and administrators. I've tagged it as "unreliable source". --George Ho (talk) 05:53, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I've substituted a more conventional source. EEng (talk) 07:29, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg I've checked the new source, and it's a reliable book. The quote now conforms exactly to that source. --Tryptofish (talk) 15:45, 27 December 2014 (UTC)