Template:Did you know nominations/Penal system in China


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Zanhe (talk) 23:49, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Not eligible.

Penal system in China

 * ...that China has a system for forced drug rehabilitation under the control of the police?
 * ALT1:... that China has a prison population only second to the United States, which is largest in the world, similar to how they rank in nominal GDP and that the U.S. rate of prison population is five times of that of China's similar to their per capita GDP? Source: China has a prison population of 1,657,812 (118 per 100,000) and the United States have a 2,121,600 (655 per 100,100) as for mid 2015,  end of 2016 respectively. Prison Studies

Rewritten and moved from draft by Viztor (talk). Self-nominated at 22:05, 2 June 2019 (UTC).


 * Symbol delete vote.svg Unfortunately this article is not eligible for DYK. The nominator has made significant improvements to the article, but it's far short of a 5x expansion. The only feasible way to make this article eligible for DYK is to bring it to GA standard. -Zanhe (talk) 23:44, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Nominator, you placed the article up for deletion WP:AFD, and then copy-pasted your own article over the top, and claimed it expanded for DYK? I'd recommend not doing a copy paste moves, as they cause issues with history (and the copyrights involved with that.) For reference, hooks should try to have the actual name of the article (without disambigs) in. These hooks would make it look like the article when on main page was about the penal system. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:08, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
 * It said if it is moved out of draft, it is eligible, regardless if there is an original article or not. Viztor (talk) 06:05, 9 June 2019 (UTC)