Template:Did you know nominations/Periclimenes rathbunae


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by   HalfGig   talk  02:24, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Periclimenes rathbunae

 * ... that if the sun anemone shrimp is separated from its host for twenty-four hours, it loses its immunity to the sea anemone's stinging cells? Source: "shrimps which had been out of contact with the anemones for as long as 24 hours were no longer protected from the nematocysts"
 * Reviewed: Jeff Forshaw

Created by Cwmhiraeth (talk) and Hanberke (talk). Nominated by Cwmhiraeth (talk) at 11:30, 10 February 2017 (UTC).


 * starting review-- Kev min  § 17:45, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg Article new enough and long enough. Article hook is well referenced and the hook conforms to article and source. If i'm understanding the sources correctly Condylactis gigantea is the usual host, with Stichodactyla helianthus being an alternate, rather then the reverse as the article currently states. Also only the first instance of a wikilinked term needs the link the rest of the links for the anemones can be de-linked per wp:overlink.-- Kev  min  § 18:00, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The pinging didn't work. The full article is available to download and states that In the Turks and Caicos Islands, Stichodactyla helianthus is the usual host, with Condylactis gigantea acceptable in the absence of the other. It might be different in other parts of its range. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 21:03, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I reread the sources and you are correct. now all we need to do it clear up the over-linking and I think we will be good to go.-- Kev  min  § 22:01, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Removed one, I think one in the lead and one in the main text is permissible. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:45, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Article is now good to go, it still is cited well and sourced, with hook matching article and sources.  No policy issues are now identified and QPQ is done.-- Kev  min  § 16:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Article is now good to go, it still is cited well and sourced, with hook matching article and sources.  No policy issues are now identified and QPQ is done.-- Kev  min  § 16:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)