Template:Did you know nominations/Person-Situation Debate

Referencing

Person-Situation Debate
Created/expanded by Linp11 (talk). Self nom at 19:01, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
 * ... that the Person-Situation Debate caused psychological researchers to doubt that people have personalities?




 * Symbol confirmed.svg New enough and long enough. No images to check for copyrights on. Formatted correctly is hook.
 * Symbol question.svg Article is not completely support by inline citations. Article reads like an academic paper, not an Encyclopedia entry. Person-Situation Debate isn't even defined in the article. Take a look at Attachment disorder, Beck Depression Inventory, Consciousness to begin to get an idea of the style required.  The lack of definition.  The unclear, not logical organisation creates WP:NPOV issues. Selection of sources for critiquing things also creates WP:NPOV issues.
 * Symbol possible vote.svg Hook is not supported by article text. Do not see word doubt anywhere in article. psychological researchers is vague. --LauraHale (talk) 04:56, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

NPOV issues and fact tags need addressing. --LauraHale (talk) 04:56, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your review! I have made some changes. Could you please explain how the Person-Situation Debate is ill-defined? I am in progress of organizing the article and making it more NPOV.Linp11 (talk) 03:00, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Changes might have been made, but the article is not completely supported by inline citations. I believe it has WP:MEDRS sourcing problems. Even with a review by classmates, these problems were not fixed. I can't see them ever getting fixed by the nominator or the class. --LauraHale (talk) 03:34, 6 May 2012 (UTC)