Template:Did you know nominations/Petra Hřebíčková


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:24, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Petra Hřebíčková

 * ... that Petra Hřebíčková (pictured) was named Best Actress in a Play at the 2008 Thalia Awards?
 * Reviewed: Mike McCray
 * Comment: All sources are in Czech. The 2008 awards were held in 2009, as is typical for acting awards.

Created by Cloudz679 (talk). Self-nominated at 18:05, 17 December 2016 (UTC).


 * Symbol confirmed.svg I was able to verify the hook and some other randomly-selected elements of the article using Google translate and didn't spot anything which looked like a copyright violation. The hook is reasonably interesting, and the photo is credibly PD. As such, this is good to go - nice work with the article. Nick-D (talk) 10:17, 19 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Symbol question.svg I'm returning the hook from the prep area. It has an unsourced section and DYK criteria are therefore not met. Also, I suggest that Thalia Awards is unsuitable for homepage exposure. While the sea of red links has already been addressed, it's a stub with just over 300kB of prose (i.e. close to none) and not a single secondary reference. Can you think of a better article to include in the hook? I appreciate that the second issue isn't a show stopper going by current DYK rules, but the first one is.  Schwede  66  22:53, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I have added some secondary references to the linked article, although not sure that this is part of the criteria. Regarding the article itself, I would argue that it's not an unsourced section, as some of her film roles are mentioned and referenced in the prose. The award ceremony is prestigious in a national context as can be seen by three independent references easily found, and qualifies as a "good enough" "article to include in the hook". Could you clarify what needs to be done here, please? C679 15:51, 30 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg I wasn't thinking that I would review the nomination once it's ready, but I'd rather stay out of that so that I don't have to be careful when promoting preps to queue. I can't do that admin function if I have had a prior reviewer involvement. So could one of the regulars please check this out?  Schwede 66  01:18, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg (Not a full review) The article's Filmography section presently has an unreferenced maintenance template atop it that was added on 13 January 2017 (diff). North America1000 08:00, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Removed section. C679 12:56, 7 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Full review still needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:01, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol voting keep.svg is a full review.
 * Subject of review was first created on 15 December, and completed by nominator on 17 December. Therefore, based on its nomination date, it appears to be new enough. As the English article is more substantial than the Czech article, it does not appear to be a duplication/translation.
 * At the point of nomination, the article had 1,309 characters of prose. It is now 1,613 characters of prose. Therefore it is now long enough.
 * Article extensively uses Czech sources, appearing to be appropriately sourced, except source #7 needs an access date.
 * At this time there are no dispute tags on the article.
 * As I cannot read Czech I will assume good faith that there is no plagiarism.
 * Article appears to be neutral.
 * Hook is 77 characters of prose and appears to be non-controversial, neutral, and cited to two non-primary sources.
 * Image attached to DYKN appears to be free of copyright issues, is in the article, has role over text, is relevant, and clear at a small size.
 * I cannot find any reason to reject this nomination at this time.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 21:22, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
 * One note, as User:Mary Mark Ockerbloom has added over 1kb of content to the article, which came up to over 300 characters of prose, perhaps the other user should receive DYK credit as well.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 21:28, 11 March 2017 (UTC)