Template:Did you know nominations/Piotr Domaradzki


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:11, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Piotr Domaradzki

 * ... that Piotr Domaradzki (pictured) was active in the Polish Solidarity movement before being granted political asylum in the United States?


 * Reviewed: Entomophaga grylli
 * Comment: Image is from User:Belissarius

Created by Roman Spinner (talk). Nominated by Doctree (talk) at 21:36, 11 November 2015 (UTC).


 * Comment I'd suggest using File:W AGKafe.jpg rather than the current photo as Mr Domaradzki was not a member of the Polish II Corps (which was a World War II-era formation), and presumably wore the uniform for some kind of social function or re-enactment meeting. I very much doubt he'd want this photo used in this way, and it's not suitable for the main page given it miss-represents his career. Nick-D (talk) 03:35, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
 * A proper suggestion. On his user page (edit of 29 March 2012) Piotr Domaradzki wrote the following caption [translated from Polish]: "In the uniform of lieutenant colonel, quartermaster of II Corps (Poland). But no, please do not misunderstand me! I was born after the war…" &mdash;Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 14:49, 19 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Symbol confirmed.svg I knew him as a Wikipedian since April 2008. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 04:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Symbol possible vote.svg No comments were made by User:Leszek Jańczuk in regards to verifying the hook, referencing, QPQ, etc. that are necessary in a review. This article still needs reviewing.4meter4 (talk) 02:00, 26 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Full review needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:51, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, I verified everything. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 08:29, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svgk, that really isn't a usable review. I know I personally wouldn't feel comfortable promoting a hook where the reviewer did not actually address each point. Please write a real review. Thanks.4meter4 (talk) 16:28, 27 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Symbol confirmed.svg New enough, long enough, written in neutral style, no copyvio or plagiarism, hook is verified. (I know Polish). I did not reviewed DYK since 2013. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 18:24, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg Thank you. That is a much better review. Still two points to address to complete the review: QPQ and image usability?4meter4 (talk) 18:42, 27 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Symbol confirmed.svg SInce Leszek isn't responding, I went ahead and checked the QPQ and the image use. QPQ is done and image is usable. I am trusting Leszek's confirmation for the rest. This article can be promoted.4meter4 (talk) 06:38, 29 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Symbol possible vote.svg The image is not usable since it does not appear in the article; only free images from the article may be used in the DYK nomination. The image suggested by Nick-D above would be eligible for this nomination as it is used in the article, or the nomination can forego using an image altogether. From reading the article, I don't see how the image currently on this nomination would be appropriate for inclusion there. BlueMoonset (talk) 09:13, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Good catch and good point. I had only checked the licensing and not if it was in the article. So the hook can be promoted but not the image.4meter4 (talk) 14:23, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm going to go ahead and promote this without the image, since that's the only holdup and there are many more hooks with images than there are slots anyways. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:11, 29 November 2015 (UTC)