Template:Did you know nominations/Plasma Instrument for Magnetic Sounding


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: withdrawn by nominator, closed by BlueMoonset (talk) 23:32, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Withdrawn at the request of the nominator.

Plasma Instrument for Magnetic Sounding, Interior Characterization of Europa using Magnetometry

 * ... that PIMS and ICEMAG will probe the oceans of Europa? Source: "This magnetometer will measure the magnetic field near Europa and – in conjunction with the PIMS instrument – infer the location, thickness and salinity of Europa’s subsurface ocean"
 * Reviewed: Bluestripe butterflyfish, Millet butterflyfish

Created by BatteryIncluded (talk). Nominated by The Bushranger (talk) at 23:24, 12 November 2017 (UTC).


 * Articles are long enough and have been created recently enough (it may have been slightly over 7 days, but I'll let that pass). QPQ checks out. Hook meets the criteria, but could use a little more information (what are PIMS and ICEMAG)?
 * Symbol possible vote.svg Both articles have possible violations of copyright, with a lot of content copied and pasted from the sources (see this analysis and this analysis. Some of the material is copied from government sites, so that may be legal (although still not good practice), but the conference abstracts are copyrighted. This must be fixed! RockMagnetist (DCO visiting scholar) (talk) 02:33, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
 * - The Bushranger One ping only 02:44, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
 * , can you see if this is a fixable issue? I'm afraid this sort of topic is a bit outside my area of expertise. - The Bushranger One ping only 21:16, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Given the above and the lack of response from the articles' creator, I think it might be best if this nom was withdrawn. - The Bushranger One ping only 06:55, 11 December 2017 (UTC)