Template:Did you know nominations/Pocket FM


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 21:29, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Pocket FM

 * ... that a portable radio transmitter called Pocket FM enables people to create pirate radio networks in areas where authoritative governments tightly control communications?


 * Comment: This is the 4th time I've nominated an article for DYK. I hope to perform a review soon, but thought I'd mention this in case I don't get to it before someone reviews this one. I've also nominated Syrnet for DYK, which is a related subject. It may make sense for them to be scheduled for different days? Finally, it seems worth pointing out that the image currently has an OTRS pending tag. The email just needs to be processed by OTRS, but I don't know if that affects the image's eligibility for use in DYK. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 18:47, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: This is the 4th time I've nominated an article for DYK. I hope to perform a review soon, but thought I'd mention this in case I don't get to it before someone reviews this one. I've also nominated Syrnet for DYK, which is a related subject. It may make sense for them to be scheduled for different days? Finally, it seems worth pointing out that the image currently has an OTRS pending tag. The email just needs to be processed by OTRS, but I don't know if that affects the image's eligibility for use in DYK. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 18:47, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Created by Rhododendrites (talk). Self-nominated at 18:45, 27 January 2016 (UTC).


 * Symbol confirmed.svg Looks good to go: New enough, long enough, neutral, no copyvios, image is usable. Everything looks cited, and hook is within policy. No QPQ, but that's not necessary for you at this point. Ashorocetus (talk &#124; contribs) 17:23, 3 February 2016 (UTC)