Template:Did you know nominations/Princess Marie Amelie of Baden


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:14, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Princess Marie Amelie of Baden

 * ... that Princess Marie Amelie of Baden (pictured), the wife of a Scottish duke, attended the 1856 baptism of Napoléon, Prince Imperial?
 * Reviewed: Mother Lü
 * Comment: New version moved from userspace on May 7

5x expanded by Ruby2010 (talk). Self nominated at 00:10, 8 May 2014 (UTC).


 * Symbol possible vote.svg I am afraid I don't get this article to be a five-fold expansion Before, After, but rather about a three-fold expansion. Regards, Iselilja (talk) 18:55, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I was hoping that the starting version would be counted as this on May 7 (the previously deleted sentences were not verifiable to me; I could add them back in I suppose, but they would still be uncited). Thoughts?  Ruby  2010/  2013  20:54, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I have tried also that version, but I still don't get a five-fold expansion. With the short 7 May version, I get with my edit counter 922 charachers if I don't include the "Titles, styles, honours and arms" section,while the expanded version with my measure is 3271 characthers (if I exclude the issue/titles sections). If I include the issue/titles sections, I get short version 1371 characters and expanded version 4108 characters. What numbers do you have by your counts? I am absolutely not an expert in this, so I am open to a second opinion. Iselilja (talk) 21:35, 11 May 2014 (UTC)


 * According to DYKcheck, the article currently has 3190 prose characters. Expansion is from the 914 prose characters the article had before the May 3 deletions, unfortumately, not the 651 prose characters after those deletions. As it says at WP:DYKSG: Fivefold expansion is calculated from the previously existing article, no matter how bad it was (copyvios are an exception), no matter whether you kept any of it and no matter if it were up for deletion. Since this was just uncited text, it counts. To be a 5x expansion, the article will need to be 4570 prose characters, which means an extra 1380 prose characters need to be added. Ruby2010, do you think this is feasible? (Incidentally, one of the deleted sentences has returned, in part: the one about Albert II of Monaco. For DYK purposes, there's nothing preventing you from adding the others to existing paragraphs, though independent paragraphs must be sourced, and you'll need sources if you intend to take the article to GA.) If you don't think it's feasible, then if this does become a Good Article it could be renominated then. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:33, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I will see what I can do to make it long enough for DYK. Thanks,  Ruby  2010/  2013  02:48, 13 May 2014 (UTC
 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg  Alrighty, I believe I have gotten there. The article now has 5342 characters by my count. Someone, please provide another review. Thanks!  Ruby   2010/  2013  03:40, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Worthy of a bye right from the start. Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:15, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg What DYK criteria did you review, Maury? Yoninah (talk) 22:23, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I reviewed what now? Oh geez, the icon. Maury Markowitz (talk) 21:48, 25 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Complete review needed. please begin with one of the 5 review symbols that appear at the top of the edit screen, and then indicate all aspects of the article that you have reviewed.  Details that are supposed to be checked in a review can be found  at  DYKReviewing guide. — Maile  (talk) 00:48, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Everything checks out, good to go. Maury Markowitz (talk) 17:25, 30 May 2014 (UTC)