Template:Did you know nominations/Pringles Unsung


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 13:08, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Pringles Unsung

 * ... that the music competition Pringles Unsung was described as being "liable to kill the most credible career"?


 * Reviewed: Willie Carlin
 * Comment: By my count the prose portion of this article just squeaks in at 1538 characters. I'll leave it to the discretion of the reviewer as to whether this is long enough for DYK. Also open to any other, better hooks.

Moved to mainspace by A Thousand Doors (talk). Self-nominated at 09:54, 3 August 2016 (UTC).


 * Symbol confirmed.svg This article is new enough and just long enough. The hook fact is cited inline, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:16, 25 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Symbol possible vote.svg I have returned this from Prep 3 as concerns have been raised about the article's completeness and notability, here. Gatoclass (talk) 14:10, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I have added the information about the winner (thanks for that) and specified that the competition was only ran once. As for questions regarding comprehensiveness and length, I said right at the top of this page that I recognise that this is a short article that only just meets the required DYK length – anything else smacks of WP:TOOLITTLE to me. I've never claimed that it's comprehensive, but, since that isn't one of the DYK criteria, I don't see why that's an issue. Thanks, A Thousand Doors (talk &#124; contribs) 08:58, 7 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Gatoclass, Fram, Black Kite, as there seem to be notability concerns, they should be raised at AfD; DYK follows the AfD consensus. In terms of completeness, with the winner noted (and that this was a once-only competition) and sourced, this appears to meet the WP:DYKSG criterion. Absent any action regarding notability or D7 interpretation, this nomination will ultimately proceed through normal DYK channels. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:53, 4 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg New reviewer needed, since there has been no formal notability challenge in over eight days. Courtesy notification to Gatoclass, Fram, and Black Kite. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:27, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg The article is still large enough, and will count as new. It is still fully cited. There are no tags currently. QPQ performed, and no copyvio detected by the tool. Hook is about 100 characters. Hook fact is there, cited, and confirmed. Being negative does not matter, as this is not about a person. Good to go. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:08, 18 October 2016 (UTC)