Template:Did you know nominations/RAAF area commands, Southern Area Command (RAAF), Central Area Command (RAAF)


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 10:39, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

RAAF area commands, Southern Area Command (RAAF), Central Area Command (RAAF)

 * ... that Southern Area and Central Area were the first two area commands formed by the Royal Australian Air Force during World War II?


 * Reviewed: Michael Rayner, Ludovic Savatier, Dorothy McKibbin

Created (RAAF area commands, Southern Area Command) / improved to Good Article status (Central Area Command) by Ian Rose (talk). Self-nominated at 14:59, 21 July 2015 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg Hook fine, verified against online source.
 * Southern Area: New enough (created 21 July, GA 25 July), long enough (5,960 characters), fully referenced.
 * Central Area: New enough (created 13 July, GA 17 July), long enough (3,523 characters), fully referenced.
 * RAAF Area Commands: New enough (created 17 July), long enough (12,147 characters), fully referenced.
 * Three hooks but on one QPQ. Three are required. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:24, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Interesting, I couldn't find much if anything on multi-article DYKs in the instructions, and when I submitted my first-ever multi not long ago I was only asked for one QPQ (which made sense to me as it's still just one nom). I don't mind the extra QPQs particularly but can you point me to the requirement so I know for future reference? Tks for reviewing BTW! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 22:12, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Supplementary Rule H4: Where a hook has more than one new or expanded article in it, an article-for-article quid pro quo (QPQ) is required: one article reviewed for each bolded article in the hook. Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:44, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Ah, the old supplementary-rule ploy, eh? Tks chief, I'll get on it right away... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 23:23, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Okay, that's done. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 00:16, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Good to go! Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:49, 2 August 2015 (UTC)