Template:Did you know nominations/RY Sagittarii


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Espresso Addict (talk) 01:03, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

RY Sagittarii

 * ... that the star RY Sagittarii is periodically dimmed by clouds of carbon dust, most likely ejected from the star itself?
 * Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Steven Novella

5x expanded by Casliber (talk). Self nominated at 14:50, 6 July 2014 (UTC).


 * Symbol possible vote.svg I'm having trouble verifying some of these astronomical object nominations. Where is the ref which confirms that RY Sagittarii is an R Coronae Borealis type star? That should be cited at the top of the article behind the statement. Gatoclass (talk) 06:06, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Added now - SIMBAD mentions it. also footnotes 4 and 7. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:44, 9 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Full review needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:13, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Expanded over 5x in the time before nomination, but the editor in question, who also did the QPQ. Article is large enough, page is neutral referenced, and there are the right kind of references to show notability. No plagiarism detected. The hook is short and interesting enough, although cited, the reference does not even mention this star, just another star in the same class. So it would be original research to say the same mechanism applies. However I have found another article that does state this cited elsewhere. So I have added this and given the good to go. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:54, 25 July 2014 (UTC)