Template:Did you know nominations/Reinforcement sensitivity theory

Reinforcement sensitivity theory
Created/expanded by Plroseman (talk). Self nom at 17:19, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
 * ... that Reinforcement sensitivity theory can be used to predict individual differences in job performance?



Problems mentioned need to be addressed before completing the rest of the review. --LauraHale (talk) 03:05, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg New enough and long enough. Hook is properly formatted.  No images in article needing copyright checked.
 * Symbol question.svg Fact tags need to be cleaned out. Hook fact is cited in lead but not in the body of article.  This makes me leery as it might be viewed as trivial and removed from the article.  In the article text, it isn't clear this is a fact and it isn't properly cited. In the first section providing background, "Reinforcement sensitivity theory" does not actually appear and the section appears a mess and I can't understand it.  It makes me wonder: WHY IS THIS IN THE ARTICLE?  Is it just padding to get the article to length? Ditto with "Gray's Biopsychological Theory: Behavioral Activation and Inhibition Systems".  What is this doing in the article?  It is completely unclear based on the text.  It thus feels like WP:OR, WP:SYNTH, WP:NPOV.  These sections need to really be improved because I'm tempted to tag the article for those problems based on the first two sections. --LauraHale (talk) 03:05, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg Article needs to be reorganized to make sense. e.g. how is "Clinical research" under "Current applications? Why is "Renaming Impulsivity" a major section? And is this section suggesting that "Impulsivity" be renamed "extroversion" or what? I don't understand what this section is saying.  MathewTownsend (talk) 18:41, 15 April 2012 (UTC)