Template:Did you know nominations/Religious language

Religious language
Created/expanded by ItsZippy (talk). Self nom at 17:59, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
 * ... that the logical positivists believed that religious language was meaningless because it cannot be verified empirically?


 * Pictogram voting keep.svg Old article but 5x expansion, long enough, hook is interesting and sourced (though to a book and not immediately verifiable.) Also not sure if author has had 5 DYKs or not, but hasnt revirewed anything. Otherwise ready to pass. Also some ingobox would not hurt at the top of the articleLihaas (talk) 13:17, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review. This is my first DYK, so (as far as I can gather) I don't meed to review anything else. I have had a look for appropriate infoboxes and navboxes to go at the top of the article, but there is currently nothing appropriate. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 16:42, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Okey, approved on AGF. And congrats on first DYK ;)Lihaas (talk) 00:55, 4 March 2012 (UTC)