Template:Did you know nominations/Roberto Tobar


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 23:42, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Roberto Tobar

 * ... that in the 2017 Segunda División final officiated by Roberto Tobar, only one team turned up for the penalty shootout?
 * ALT1:... that Roberto Tobar had to stop refereeing a 2017 Copa Libertadores match due to a muscle injury?
 * Reviewed: Joe Kryczka (2/5)

Created by Joseph2302 (talk). Self-nominated at 19:05, 6 December 2018 (UTC).


 * Fixed the wikilinks and also the Reyes issue. I wasn't sure which Reyes is was, as Lorenzo wasn't listed at the Reyes dab page- thanks for finding out. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:16, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Hey there. First off, I'm glad I could be of assistance with the Reyes issue.  Since he does have international experience, I'm a little surprised that no one's put him on that page yet.  Anyway, to the article:  The fixes make the article look better.  Extra points for adding some extra years and mentions of the match legs.  Among things I've noticed since:
 * 1. There's a weird phrasing about the Recopa as it discusses "...the Recopa Sudamericana second leg match...".  "Second leg of the Recopa Sudamericana" looks better and is in line with all the other match legs mentioned in the article.
 * 2. This doesn't really have to be done, but for consistency, the link to Chapecoense in the Recopa section should go directly to Associação Chapecoense de Futebol instead.  I noticed it before and wanted to keep it until I noticed Gremio's link on that article is to its full club name and not the redirect I've used here (which also goes to the club page).  That was an oversight on my part, and I apologize.
 * I rechecked everything else, and I didn't see anything else that needed fixing. I think taking care of at least the first issue should send this article further along the DYK line and earn this article its green checkmark.  It's not going to take much longer for this article to get it at this rate. -- JustJamie820 (talk) 23:39, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Changes made. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:40, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg! I see nothing else that needs to be done.  Good work and I look forward to eventually seeing this on the main page. -- JustJamie820 (talk) 20:56, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg! I see nothing else that needs to be done.  Good work and I look forward to eventually seeing this on the main page. -- JustJamie820 (talk) 20:56, 12 December 2018 (UTC)