Template:Did you know nominations/Roesia si Pengkor

Roesia si Pengkor

 * ... that The Teng Chun was inspired by a Dutchman to target his film Roesia si Pengkor at native Indonesians?
 * ALT1:... that Roesia si Pengkor was the first film by The Teng Chun targeted at native Indonesians?
 * Reviewed: Slender catshark

Created by Crisco 1492 (talk). Self nominated at 14:22, 16 October 2013 (UTC).


 * Symbol voting keep.svg Dates and lengths both good. Hook facts and about half the article referenced to off-line sources, so AGF.  No problems found with plagiarism or close paraphrasing within the sections of the article referenced to on-line sources. --Allen3 talk 14:25, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg The article doesn't mention that The Teng Chun was inspired by the Dutchman, nor that it was his first film targeted at native indonesians, making both hooks ineligible. Mentoz86 (talk) 09:34, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid you didn't read carefully enough. " The success of the earlier films (Dutchman Albert Balink's Terang Boelan among them) convinced him that it presented greater financial opportunities." and "Though his earlier works had been oriented at ethnic Chinese audiences, Roesia si Pengkor was targeted at the native population of the Indies." has a clear implication of the second hook. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 18:33, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * You might be correct that I didn't read it carefully enough, cause I thought you were talking about The's earlier films. Maybe change that sentance to "the success of Albert Balink films". When it comes to the second hook, that sentance doesn't actually state that it was the first film by The Teng Chun targeted at native Indonesian. Either way, shouldn't those two sentances have an inline citation, and not a citation at the end of the paragraph, per the DYK-guidelines? Mentoz86 (talk) 19:20, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I've duplicated the reference. "his earlier works" does not have a qualifier, which means this indicates all of The's films, and thus the "first" is very clearly implicated. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:52, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Thanks for clarifying, I'm reinstating the tick per the original review. Mentoz86 (talk) 05:55, 10 November 2013 (UTC)