Template:Did you know nominations/Romblon


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by BencherliteTalk 01:12, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Romblon

 * ... that the Fort San Andres (pictured) in Romblon was used for defense against Muslim pirates?


 * Reviewed: pending


 * I suggest that the hook should be: ...that the Fort San Andres (pictured) in Romblon, Philippines was used for defense against Muslim pirates? — Lawrence Ruiz (talk) 05:43, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Improved to Good Article status by Lawrence ruiz (talk). Nominated by Shhhhwwww!! (talk) at 22:37, 5 May 2016 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg Hi, I can't see where the source given in the article for the hook fact,, mentions pirates of any religion. Please find and add a citation for the hook fact into the article. Taknaran (talk) 13:27, 18 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Alt1 ... that the name of Romblon (town pictured) pertains to a chicken in the act of sitting on its eggs on a nest? Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 22:10, 22 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Symbol possible vote.svg It has been three weeks and no QPQ has been supplied. There's no point in calling for a reviewer with it missing, especially as Shhhhwwww!! has a poor record of actually supplying quid pro quo reviews for his nominations. Allowing seven days from today for a QPQ to be supplied. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:33, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I have been very busy in the past two weeks so sorry about this. I am going to try to do this today. Sorry about that. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 15:41, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol delete vote.svg Has been nearly a month since the original nomination and still no DYK QPQ. Agree with BlueMoonset above. Article not eligible as QPQ not provided despite being given ample time. Cowlibob (talk) 11:42, 5 June 2016 (UTC)