Template:Did you know nominations/Rosetta Stone v. Google Inc


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 14:33, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Rosetta Stone v. Google Inc

 * ... that Google allows advertisers to use third-party trademarks in their advertising text and also as their advertisement keywords?

Created by Harcamone (talk). Nominated by Reena.bajpai (talk) at 21:13, 12 March 2015 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg The hook is missing a link to this article, and I don't see any word that relates to the topic yet. George Ho (talk) 22:57, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I added a link, but Harcamone, Reena.bajpai, or anyone else should feel free to do it differently or suggest a different hook. M AN d ARAX  •  XAЯA b ИA M  08:37, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Issue resolved. I'll leave this nomination in your or someone else's hands. George Ho (talk) 19:10, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
 * ? PanydThe muffin is not subtle 13:09, 10 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Full review needed by new reviewer. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:24, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol voting keep.svg Unquestionably long enough, hook fine, no neutrality issues, assume good faith on offline sources. However, according to WP:DYKCHECK, "Assuming article is at 5x now, expansion began 149 edits ago on March 4, 2015" and this was nominated on March 12 2015. There is a 7-day limit for nominations to be put forward, but as you're both new enough, and the fact that I think that this could probably survive a good article nomination (thereby resetting its newness), I'm happy to overlook that rule.-- Laun  chba  ller  00:52, 23 April 2015 (UTC)