Template:Did you know nominations/Roupala montana

Roupala montana, Richeria grandis, Parinari campestris

 * ... that Roupala montana, Richeria grandis (pictured) and Parinari campestris, all known by the common name bois bandé, are reputed to have aphrodisiac properties?
 * Reviewed: Shell growth in estuaries

Created/expanded by Guettarda (talk). Self nom at 15:59, 14 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Reviewing now.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:59, 24 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Symbol confirmed.svg I assume good faith on the offline reference. This hook checks out otherwise. Richeria grandis is an expansion begun January 10, while the others are new enough January articles.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:47, 24 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Symbol possible vote.svg This is a triple hook, which under DYK rules revised a few months ago requires three QPQ reviews. (It is no longer acceptable to do hook-for-hook reviews; article-for-article reviews are required.) Unfortunately, that means that another two reviews are required before this nomination can properly be approved. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:42, 25 January 2013 (UTC)


 * I wasn't aware of that requirement. I've added Hierarchical generalized linear model and Cornulaca monacantha Guettarda (talk) 18:49, 29 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Pictogram voting keep.svg As I said, it's a fairly recent change. Thanks for doing the two additional reviews. Restoring approval per TonyTheTiger, but using the gray AGF tick, since the key hook fact is dependent on an offline source. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:21, 30 January 2013 (UTC)