Template:Did you know nominations/Royal Bangkok Sports Club


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:37, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Royal Bangkok Sports Club

 * ... that in addition to being the oldest racecourse and second-oldest golf course in Thailand, the Royal Bangkok Sports Club also served as its first airfield? Source:, in Thai, but see also.
 * Reviewed: William Villiers, 2nd Viscount Grandison

5x expanded by Paul_012 (talk). Self-nominated at 08:25, 15 April 2018 (UTC).


 * Symbol confirmed.svg Article was expanded fivefold within seven days of nomination, is over the required size and has no copyvio issues. The article is well written, suitably referenced and neutral. Hook is interesting, AGF on some of the sourcing due to offline and foreign language sources. User has submitted a QPQ review to meet the requirement. Good to go. Kosack (talk) 14:14, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg Hello, I came by to promote this, but the prose has multiple bolded words. Is this necessary? It might be a good idea to leave those bolded words unbolded in the prose. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:29, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Narutolovehinata5, my intention was to follow WP:MOSBOLD, which states, "This is also done, at the first occurrence in running text, of a term that is redirected to the article or one of its subsections, whether the term appears in the lead or not." (Though I just noticed that I forgot to actually create the redirects; fixed now.) This, however, isn't a strict requirement, so feel free to remove the boldface if you disagree. --Paul_012 (talk) 05:54, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
 * , typically I've seen that formulation only in the lead. How about expanding the lead, and mentioning the three other organizations there in bold? --Usernameunique (talk) 09:50, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Usernameunique, that's a good suggestion, but not something I'm prepared to work on right away. I've removed the boldface in this instance, but if you disagree with this specific piece of MOS guidance in general it'd probably be best to bring it up at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Text formatting. --Paul_012 (talk) 13:39, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Narutolovehinata5, I believe the issue you're concerned of has been resolved? --Paul_012 (talk) 21:41, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg No more outstanding issues so I am restoring Kosack's tick. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 23:37, 16 May 2018 (UTC)