Template:Did you know nominations/Royal Oak, Frindsbury


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:57, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Royal Oak, Frindsbury

 * ... that the Royal Oak, Frindsbury (pictured), a 17th-century public house in England, was recently threatened with demolition, but has now been Grade II listed?


 * ALT1:... that the Royal Oak, Frindsbury (pictured), a 17th-century public house in England, is rumoured to contain a timber from HMS Royal Oak?
 * Comment: A new article created today. I'm not sure what the best hook would be - the connection to the HMS Royal Oak is probably the most interesting, but may just be a local rumour. The demolition threat and recent listed building status may be a bit too recent/news-y. Alt hooks would be welcome. :-) Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:53, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Castle of Pambre
 * Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Castle of Pambre

Created by Mike Peel (talk). Self-nominated at 18:53, 5 June 2016 (UTC).




 * Review by Maile
 * QPQ
 * June 14, 2016 QPQ review by Mike Peel has not been used as a QPQ on any previous nomination
 * Eligibility
 * Article created by Mike Peel on June 5, 2016, and has 3558 characters (0 words) "readable prose size"
 * Article is NPOV, currently stable, no edit wars, no dispute tags
 * Sourcing
 * Every paragraph sourced inline and online
 * Citations are appropriately formatted
 * No bare URLs
 * Hook
 * Hook is 146 characters, NPOV, stated in the article and sourced
 * ALT1 hook is 123 characters, NPOV, stated in the article and sourced
 * Image
 * Image is used in the article, and appropriately licensed on Commons
 * Tools
 * Earwig's tool shows no concerns
 * Labs Duplication Detector run on each individual source shows no issues of concern
 * External links are working links, and are not redirects
 * Dab solver says there are no disambiguation links in the article

we need a QPQ from you. My only suggestion would be to perhaps link "public house", because outside of England, people might not know you are referring to a pub. I also agree that ALT1 is the more interesting hook. — Maile (talk) 21:35, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review! I've reviewed another nomination now, link added, sorry for the delay (real life intervened). I've also added the link to public house. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 22:42, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination passes now that QPQ has been done. Good job. — Maile (talk) 22:47, 14 June 2016 (UTC)