Template:Did you know nominations/Sacred Jackfruit Tree, Kaina


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by — Maile (talk) 23:59, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Sacred Jackfruit Tree, Kaina

 * ... that one of the seven images of Krishna carved from the Sacred Jackfruit Tree, Kaina is deified in the Shree Govindajee Temple (pictured) in the palace at Imphal?


 * Reviewed: The third article in Template:Did you know nominations/Church of England churches in Wales

Created by Nvvchar (talk). Self-nominated at 01:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg New article, long enough, no possible copyvios found, QPQ done, image is good to use with proper license on Commons, hook checks out too. Did some copyediting of typos. But some things still remain. "...the seventh image installed at." is an incomplete sentence. §§ Dharmadhyaksha §§ {Talk / Edits} 04:26, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review. Sorry about the incomplete sentence. I have now completed the sentence and it is from the same reference 1. Nvvchar . 11:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Good to go now. §§ Dharmadhyaksha §§ {Talk / Edits} 04:44, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

, I regret that I had to remove this hook from Prep. The Historical legend section was badly in need of editing for English. I broke it up into smaller paragraphs, also. I did what I could, but you and/or someone else with a good command of English needs to look at that section. Without access to the sources, I'm not sure if I understood all of it, but I tried. There is a gap between 1759 when Krishna tells him to carve his image in the tree, and 1765 where the very next paragraph begins. What happened in those 6 years? It's a big unexplained gap of time. It's probably a good idea to leave it broken up into smaller paragraphs, but you need to attach citations at least at the end of each paragraph.

After that is done, it's probably a good idea to have someone who was not involved with the article or the nomination do a full review on what is in the article. Sorry this had to happen, but better on this template than elsewhere. Good luck. — Maile (talk) 22:43, 10 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Symbol confirmed.svg Note - has done some copy editing, and I am satisfied with the result.  I am re-promoting this article and putting it back into a prep.   — Maile  (talk) 23:59, 11 May 2016 (UTC)